On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 07:07:53AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 09:32:38AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:22:44 +0530
> > Bharata B Rao wrote:
> >
> > > ICPState objects were being allocated before CPU thread realization.
> > > However commit 9ed656631
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 09:32:38AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:22:44 +0530
> Bharata B Rao wrote:
>
> > ICPState objects were being allocated before CPU thread realization.
> > However commit 9ed656631d73 (xics: setup cpu at realize time) reversed it
> > by allocating ICPStat
On Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:22:44 +0530
Bharata B Rao wrote:
> ICPState objects were being allocated before CPU thread realization.
> However commit 9ed656631d73 (xics: setup cpu at realize time) reversed it
> by allocating ICPState objects after CPU thread is realized. But it
> didn't take care to fi
ICPState objects were being allocated before CPU thread realization.
However commit 9ed656631d73 (xics: setup cpu at realize time) reversed it
by allocating ICPState objects after CPU thread is realized. But it
didn't take care to fix the error path because of which we observe
a SIGSEGV when CPU th