[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1470170] Re: Unsupported syscalls 370 and 355

2016-01-12 Thread pranith
Fix has been committed upstream. ** Changed in: qemu Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu- devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1470170 Title: Unsupported syscalls 370 and 355 Status in QEM

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1470170] Re: Unsupported syscalls 370 and 355

2015-12-09 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
Laurent, I just encountered the same missing syscall on qemu-m68k: Unpacking udev (228-2) over (227-2) ... Preparing to unpack .../libsystemd0_228-2_m68k.deb ... Unpacking libsystemd0:m68k (228-2) over (227-2) ... Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ... Not building database; man-db/auto-upd

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Bug 1470170] Re: Unsupported syscalls 370 and 355

2015-06-30 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 30/06/2015 19:49, Peter Maydell a écrit : > Syscall 370 is name_to_handle_at, and 355 is signalfd4. (Likely if > name_to_handle_at succeeds then it'll want open_by_handle_at too.) > > This patch implements the signalfd syscalls, though we haven't got to > reviewing it yet. > http://patchwork

[Qemu-devel] [Bug 1470170] Re: Unsupported syscalls 370 and 355

2015-06-30 Thread Peter Maydell
Syscall 370 is name_to_handle_at, and 355 is signalfd4. (Likely if name_to_handle_at succeeds then it'll want open_by_handle_at too.) This patch implements the signalfd syscalls, though we haven't got to reviewing it yet. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/478072/ It looks like systemd is coping