On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 11:15:48AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:06:58 +0800
> Jason Wang wrote:
>
> > The problem is for pci: without this patch, guest may always see modern
> > bar is "disable-modern=false". But with this patch, on an old kernel
> > that does not support V
On Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:06:58 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> The problem is for pci: without this patch, guest may always see modern
> bar is "disable-modern=false". But with this patch, on an old kernel
> that does not support VERSION_1, even "disable-modern=false" were
> specified, guest can not see m
On 12/02/2015 06:11 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:54:09 +0800
> Jason Wang wrote:
>
>> I wonder instead of rolling back in post_plugged(), maybe we could just
>> delay the region setups to post_plugged().
> If this is the saner thing to do for pci, sure.
>
>> Or just call tra
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 11:11:28AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:54:09 +0800
> Jason Wang wrote:
>
> > I wonder instead of rolling back in post_plugged(), maybe we could just
> > delay the region setups to post_plugged().
>
> If this is the saner thing to do for pci, sure.
On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:54:09 +0800
Jason Wang wrote:
> I wonder instead of rolling back in post_plugged(), maybe we could just
> delay the region setups to post_plugged().
If this is the saner thing to do for pci, sure.
> Or just call transport
> specific device_plugged() after get_features() c
On 12/01/2015 10:21 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:10:40 +0100
> Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 11:11:08 +0100
>> Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>
>>> Some of our test folks tried to run a recent-ish qemu (nearly 2.5)
>>> combined with an old host kernel (and a virtio-1 c
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:10:40 +0100
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 11:11:08 +0100
> Cornelia Huck wrote:
>
> > Some of our test folks tried to run a recent-ish qemu (nearly 2.5)
> > combined with an old host kernel (and a virtio-1 capable guest).
> >
> > In that setup, we had the tran
On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 11:11:08 +0100
Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Some of our test folks tried to run a recent-ish qemu (nearly 2.5)
> combined with an old host kernel (and a virtio-1 capable guest).
>
> In that setup, we had the transport (in that case, virtio-ccw)
> advertise VERSION_1 as it is a revis
Some of our test folks tried to run a recent-ish qemu (nearly 2.5)
combined with an old host kernel (and a virtio-1 capable guest).
In that setup, we had the transport (in that case, virtio-ccw)
advertise VERSION_1 as it is a revision 1 device. However, the old
vhost driver did not support virtio-
