On 9/2/20 4:11 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 9/2/20 12:09 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 01/09/2020 17.20, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> Version 2. Serves me right for not testing 32-bit host
>>> when I knew there was a patch that mattered.
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> I'm afraid, but I think this PR
On 9/2/20 12:09 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 01/09/2020 17.20, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> Version 2. Serves me right for not testing 32-bit host
>> when I knew there was a patch that mattered.
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> I'm afraid, but I think this PR broke the
> tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:Repl
On 01/09/2020 17.20, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Version 2. Serves me right for not testing 32-bit host
> when I knew there was a patch that mattered.
Hi Richard,
I'm afraid, but I think this PR broke the
tests/acceptance/replay_kernel.py:ReplayKernel.test_microblaze_s3adsp1800
acceptance
test:
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 16:20, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> Version 2. Serves me right for not testing 32-bit host
> when I knew there was a patch that mattered.
>
>
> r~
>
> The following changes since commit 2f4c51c0f384d7888a04b4815861e6d5fd244d75:
>
> Merge remote-tracking branch
> 'remotes/
Version 2. Serves me right for not testing 32-bit host
when I knew there was a patch that mattered.
r~
The following changes since commit 2f4c51c0f384d7888a04b4815861e6d5fd244d75:
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/kraxel/tags/usb-20200831-pull-request'
into staging (2020-08-31 19:39:13
