Re: [PULL 27/43] target/loongarch: Add TLB instruction support

2025-02-10 Thread Peter Maydell
Ping^2 -- could one of the loongarch maintainers have a look at this problem with the TLB code where it does an out-of-range shift, please? This is the only sanitizer failure in 'make check-functional' for the whole of QEMU, so it would be nice to get this to a 100% pass. thanks -- PMM On Tue, 26

Re: [PULL 27/43] target/loongarch: Add TLB instruction support

2024-11-26 Thread Peter Maydell
Ping regarding this UB due to an invalid shift -- I think this is now the only remaining sanitizer error in a 'make check-functional', so it would be nice to get it fixed... thanks -- PMM On Thu, 7 Nov 2024 at 17:33, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 00:31, Richard Henderson > wrot

Re: [PULL 27/43] target/loongarch: Add TLB instruction support

2024-11-07 Thread Peter Maydell
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 00:31, Richard Henderson wrote: > > From: Xiaojuan Yang > > This includes: > - TLBSRCH > - TLBRD > - TLBWR > - TLBFILL > - TLBCLR > - TLBFLUSH > - INVTLB Hi; running the loongarch functional tests on a build with the clang undefined-behaviour sanitizer enabled reveals an at

[PULL 27/43] target/loongarch: Add TLB instruction support

2022-06-06 Thread Richard Henderson
From: Xiaojuan Yang This includes: - TLBSRCH - TLBRD - TLBWR - TLBFILL - TLBCLR - TLBFLUSH - INVTLB Signed-off-by: Xiaojuan Yang Signed-off-by: Song Gao Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson Message-Id: <20220606124333.2060567-28-yangxiaoj...@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson --- targe