On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 06:52, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> This is TYPE_SD_CARD's ("sd-card"). What exactly does that device
> model?
It is I think supposed to be an SD card. The modelling
may well be odd -- it's a qomification of a pre-existing
abstraction layer that predates QOM and qbus.
> If i
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 14:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>
>> As we have no interest in the underlying block geometry,
>> directly call blk_getlength(). We have to care about machines
>> creating SD card with not drive attached (probably incorrect
>> API use). Simply
On 7/5/20 12:26 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/5/20 12:18 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 7/5/20 12:10 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 7/4/20 1:42 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 7/3/20 5:16 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/3/20 3:23 PM, Peter Maydel
On 7/5/20 12:18 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/5/20 12:10 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 7/4/20 1:42 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 7/3/20 5:16 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 7/3/20 3:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 14:39, Philippe Ma
On 7/5/20 12:10 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/4/20 1:42 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 7/3/20 5:16 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> On 7/3/20 3:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 14:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
wrote:
>
> As we have no inte
On 7/4/20 1:42 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/3/20 5:16 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 7/3/20 3:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 14:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
>>> wrote:
As we have no interest in the underlying block geometry,
directly call
On 7/3/20 5:16 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 7/3/20 3:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 14:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>
>>> As we have no interest in the underlying block geometry,
>>> directly call blk_getlength(). We have to care about machines
>>> creating
On 7/3/20 3:23 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 14:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>
>> As we have no interest in the underlying block geometry,
>> directly call blk_getlength(). We have to care about machines
>> creating SD card with not drive attached (probably incorrect
>> A
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 at 14:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> As we have no interest in the underlying block geometry,
> directly call blk_getlength(). We have to care about machines
> creating SD card with not drive attached (probably incorrect
> API use). Simply emit a warning when such Franke
As we have no interest in the underlying block geometry,
directly call blk_getlength(). We have to care about machines
creating SD card with not drive attached (probably incorrect
API use). Simply emit a warning when such Frankenstein cards
of zero size are reset.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-D
10 matches
Mail list logo