On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 11:04:25AM +0200, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Aug 17 08:29, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > On Jul 30 00:50, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > > On Jul 29 15:01, Andrzej Jakowski wrote:
> > > > So far it was not possible to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same
> > > > device, because BAR2 was u
On Aug 17 08:29, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Jul 30 00:50, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> > On Jul 29 15:01, Andrzej Jakowski wrote:
> > > So far it was not possible to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same
> > > device, because BAR2 was used exclusively either of PMR or CMB. This
> > > patch places CMB at BAR
On Jul 30 00:50, Klaus Jensen wrote:
> On Jul 29 15:01, Andrzej Jakowski wrote:
> > So far it was not possible to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same
> > device, because BAR2 was used exclusively either of PMR or CMB. This
> > patch places CMB at BAR4 offset so it not conflicts with MSI-X vectors
On Jul 29 15:01, Andrzej Jakowski wrote:
> So far it was not possible to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same
> device, because BAR2 was used exclusively either of PMR or CMB. This
> patch places CMB at BAR4 offset so it not conflicts with MSI-X vectors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Jakowski
> ---
So far it was not possible to have CMB and PMR emulated on the same
device, because BAR2 was used exclusively either of PMR or CMB. This
patch places CMB at BAR4 offset so it not conflicts with MSI-X vectors.
Signed-off-by: Andrzej Jakowski
---
hw/block/nvme.c | 124
