Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] block: Refactor get_tmp_filename()

2022-10-21 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 10.10.2022 um 06:04 hat Bin Meng geschrieben: > At present there are two callers of get_tmp_filename() and they are > inconsistent. > > One does: > > /* TODO: extra byte is a hack to ensure MAX_PATH space on Windows. */ > char *tmp_filename = g_malloc0(PATH_MAX + 1); > ... > re

Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] block: Refactor get_tmp_filename()

2022-10-16 Thread Bin Meng
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:05 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > At present there are two callers of get_tmp_filename() and they are > inconsistent. > > One does: > > /* TODO: extra byte is a hack to ensure MAX_PATH space on Windows. */ > char *tmp_filename = g_malloc0(PATH_MAX + 1); > ... > r

[PATCH v6 2/2] block: Refactor get_tmp_filename()

2022-10-09 Thread Bin Meng
At present there are two callers of get_tmp_filename() and they are inconsistent. One does: /* TODO: extra byte is a hack to ensure MAX_PATH space on Windows. */ char *tmp_filename = g_malloc0(PATH_MAX + 1); ... ret = get_tmp_filename(tmp_filename, PATH_MAX + 1); while the other