23.04.2020 18:01, Kevin Wolf wrote:
When extending the size of an image that has a backing file larger than
its old size, make sure that the backing file data doesn't become
visible in the guest, but the added area is properly zeroed out.
Consider the following scenario where the overlay is shor
On 23.04.20 17:01, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> When extending the size of an image that has a backing file larger than
> its old size, make sure that the backing file data doesn't become
> visible in the guest, but the added area is properly zeroed out.
>
> Consider the following scenario where the overla
On 4/23/20 10:01 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
When extending the size of an image that has a backing file larger than
its old size, make sure that the backing file data doesn't become
visible in the guest, but the added area is properly zeroed out.
Consider the following scenario where the overlay is s
When extending the size of an image that has a backing file larger than
its old size, make sure that the backing file data doesn't become
visible in the guest, but the added area is properly zeroed out.
Consider the following scenario where the overlay is shorter than its
backing file:
base.q
