On 1/31/20 8:08 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 30/01/2020 23.31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 1/21/20 10:52 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
We are going to enable some of the python-based tests in the "auto"
group,
and these tests require virtio-blk to work properly. Running iotests
without virtio-blk li
On 30/01/2020 23.31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 1/21/20 10:52 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> We are going to enable some of the python-based tests in the "auto"
>> group,
>> and these tests require virtio-blk to work properly. Running iotests
>> without virtio-blk likely does not make too much s
On 1/21/20 10:52 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
We are going to enable some of the python-based tests in the "auto" group,
and these tests require virtio-blk to work properly. Running iotests
without virtio-blk likely does not make too much sense anyway, so instead
of adding a check for the availability
We are going to enable some of the python-based tests in the "auto" group,
and these tests require virtio-blk to work properly. Running iotests
without virtio-blk likely does not make too much sense anyway, so instead
of adding a check for the availability of virtio-blk to each and every
test (whic
