On 2/19/20 2:44 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:23:47 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 2/17/20 6:34 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by ge
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 18:23:47 +0100
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 2/17/20 6:34 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
> > continue running with max RAM size supported.
> > Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
> >
On 2/17/20 6:34 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to fo
On 2/17/20 9:34 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
> continue running with max RAM size supported.
> Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
> possible for board to fix things up for user.
>
> Make it error message and
If user provided non-sense RAM size, board will complain and
continue running with max RAM size supported.
Also RAM is going to be allocated by generic code, so it won't be
possible for board to fix things up for user.
Make it error message and exit to force user fix CLI,
instead of accepting non-
