On 25/11/2021 12:47, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:33 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Hi Frédéric,
On 11/24/21 07:55, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
On 24/11/2021 07:12, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:16 AM Frédéric Pétrot
wrote:
This patch is kind of a me
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:33 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> Hi Frédéric,
>
> On 11/24/21 07:55, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
> > On 24/11/2021 07:12, Alistair Francis wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:16 AM Frédéric Pétrot
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This patch is kind of a mess because several f
Hi Frédéric,
On 11/24/21 07:55, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
> On 24/11/2021 07:12, Alistair Francis wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:16 AM Frédéric Pétrot
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch is kind of a mess because several files have to be slightly
>>> modified to allow for a new target. In the current
On 24/11/2021 07:12, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:16 AM Frédéric Pétrot
wrote:
This patch is kind of a mess because several files have to be slightly
modified to allow for a new target. In the current status, we have done
our best to have RV64 and RV128 under the same RV64
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:16 AM Frédéric Pétrot
wrote:
>
> This patch is kind of a mess because several files have to be slightly
> modified to allow for a new target. In the current status, we have done
> our best to have RV64 and RV128 under the same RV64 umbrella, but there
> is still work to d
This patch is kind of a mess because several files have to be slightly
modified to allow for a new target. In the current status, we have done
our best to have RV64 and RV128 under the same RV64 umbrella, but there
is still work to do to have a single executable for both.
In particular, we have no
