Hi Gustavo,
On 6/19/25 7:07 PM, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On 6/17/25 10:22, Eric Auger wrote:
>> Hi Gustavo,
>>
>> On 6/16/25 3:18 PM, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>>> The comment about the mapping from SMMU to ITS is incorrect and it
>>> reads
>>> "RC -> ITS". The code in question actually ma
Hi Eric,
On 6/17/25 10:22, Eric Auger wrote:
Hi Gustavo,
On 6/16/25 3:18 PM, Gustavo Romero wrote:
The comment about the mapping from SMMU to ITS is incorrect and it reads
"RC -> ITS". The code in question actually maps SMMU -> ITS, so the
mapping in question is not direct. The direct mapping,
Hi Gustavo,
On 6/16/25 3:18 PM, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> The comment about the mapping from SMMU to ITS is incorrect and it reads
> "RC -> ITS". The code in question actually maps SMMU -> ITS, so the
> mapping in question is not direct. The direct mapping, i.e., RC -> ITS,
> is handled a bit furthe
The comment about the mapping from SMMU to ITS is incorrect and it reads
"RC -> ITS". The code in question actually maps SMMU -> ITS, so the
mapping in question is not direct. The direct mapping, i.e., RC -> ITS,
is handled a bit further down in the code, in the else block, and we
take the opportun
