On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:57:00AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 5/20/20 10:06 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > Several block device properties related to blocksize configuration must
> > be in certain relationship WRT each other: physical block must be no
> > smaller than logical block; min_
Am 20.05.2020 um 10:59 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:57 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Roman,
> >
> > On 5/20/20 10:06 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > > Several block device properties related to blocksize configuration must
> > > be in certain re
Am 20.05.2020 um 10:57 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
> Hi Roman,
>
> On 5/20/20 10:06 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > Several block device properties related to blocksize configuration must
> > be in certain relationship WRT each other: physical block must be no
> > smaller than logical bloc
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:57 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
wrote:
>
> Hi Roman,
>
> On 5/20/20 10:06 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
> > Several block device properties related to blocksize configuration must
> > be in certain relationship WRT each other: physical block must be no
> > smaller than logical blo
Hi Roman,
On 5/20/20 10:06 AM, Roman Kagan wrote:
Several block device properties related to blocksize configuration must
be in certain relationship WRT each other: physical block must be no
smaller than logical block; min_io_size, opt_io_size, and
discard_granularity must be a multiple of a log
Several block device properties related to blocksize configuration must
be in certain relationship WRT each other: physical block must be no
smaller than logical block; min_io_size, opt_io_size, and
discard_granularity must be a multiple of a logical block.
To ensure these requirements are met, ad