On Wed 15 Apr 2020 10:39:26 AM CEST, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> + * Returns 1 on success, -errno on failure (in order to match the
>> + * return value of handle_copied() and handle_alloc()).
>
> Hmm, honestly, I don't like this idea. handle_copied and handle_alloc
> has special return c
17.03.2020 21:16, Alberto Garcia wrote:
If an image has subclusters then there are more copy-on-write
scenarios that we need to consider. Let's say we have a write request
from the middle of subcluster #3 until the end of the cluster:
- If the cluster is new, then subclusters #0 to #3 from t
If an image has subclusters then there are more copy-on-write
scenarios that we need to consider. Let's say we have a write request
from the middle of subcluster #3 until the end of the cluster:
- If the cluster is new, then subclusters #0 to #3 from the old
cluster must be copied into the
