This is the correct fix, thanks!
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:39 AM Alistair Francis wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 1:41 AM Jim Shu wrote:
> >
> > Larger initrd image will overlap the DTB at 3GB address. Since 64-bit
> > system doesn't have 32-bit addressable issue, we just load DTB to the en
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 1:41 AM Jim Shu wrote:
>
> Larger initrd image will overlap the DTB at 3GB address. Since 64-bit
> system doesn't have 32-bit addressable issue, we just load DTB to the end
> of dram in 64-bit system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Shu
> ---
> hw/riscv/boot.c| 14
On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 12:41 AM Jim Shu wrote:
>
> Larger initrd image will overlap the DTB at 3GB address. Since 64-bit
> system doesn't have 32-bit addressable issue, we just load DTB to the end
> of dram in 64-bit system.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Shu
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis
Alistair
>
On 11/20/24 12:39 PM, Jim Shu wrote:
Larger initrd image will overlap the DTB at 3GB address. Since 64-bit
system doesn't have 32-bit addressable issue, we just load DTB to the end
of dram in 64-bit system.
Signed-off-by: Jim Shu
---
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
hw/riscv/boot
Larger initrd image will overlap the DTB at 3GB address. Since 64-bit
system doesn't have 32-bit addressable issue, we just load DTB to the end
of dram in 64-bit system.
Signed-off-by: Jim Shu
---
hw/riscv/boot.c| 14 +-
hw/riscv/microchip_pfsoc.c | 4 ++--
hw/riscv/sifi
