On 10/10/22 12:51, Francisco Iglesias wrote:
Hi Cedric,
On [2022 Oct 10] Mon 11:58:40, Michael Walle wrote:
Am 2022-10-10 08:23, schrieb Cédric Le Goater:
On 10/7/22 16:44, Francisco Iglesias wrote:
--- a/hw/block/m25p80.c
+++ b/hw/block/m25p80.c
@@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ static const FlashPartI
On 10/10/22 11:58, Michael Walle wrote:
Am 2022-10-10 08:23, schrieb Cédric Le Goater:
On 10/7/22 16:44, Francisco Iglesias wrote:
--- a/hw/block/m25p80.c
+++ b/hw/block/m25p80.c
@@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ static const FlashPartInfo known_devices[] = {
{ INFO("mx25l12855e", 0xc22618, 0,
Hi Cedric,
On [2022 Oct 10] Mon 11:58:40, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2022-10-10 08:23, schrieb Cédric Le Goater:
> > On 10/7/22 16:44, Francisco Iglesias wrote:
>
> > > > --- a/hw/block/m25p80.c
> > > > +++ b/hw/block/m25p80.c
> > > > @@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ static const FlashPartInfo known_devices[]
Am 2022-10-10 08:23, schrieb Cédric Le Goater:
On 10/7/22 16:44, Francisco Iglesias wrote:
--- a/hw/block/m25p80.c
+++ b/hw/block/m25p80.c
@@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ static const FlashPartInfo known_devices[] = {
{ INFO("mx25l12855e", 0xc22618, 0, 64 << 10, 256, 0) },
{ INFO6("mx25l
On 10/7/22 16:44, Francisco Iglesias wrote:
On [2022 Jul 22] Fri 08:35:58, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
The mx25l25635e and mx25l25635f chips have the same JEDEC id but the
mx25l25635f has more capabilities reported in the SFDP table. Support
for 4B opcodes is of interest because it is exploited by t
On [2022 Jul 22] Fri 08:35:58, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> The mx25l25635e and mx25l25635f chips have the same JEDEC id but the
> mx25l25635f has more capabilities reported in the SFDP table. Support
> for 4B opcodes is of interest because it is exploited by the Linux
> kernel.
>
> The SFDP table si
The mx25l25635e and mx25l25635f chips have the same JEDEC id but the
mx25l25635f has more capabilities reported in the SFDP table. Support
for 4B opcodes is of interest because it is exploited by the Linux
kernel.
The SFDP table size is 0x200 bytes long. The mandatory table for basic
features is a
