On Wed, 2022-09-21 at 15:29 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 20:28:31 +0800
> Robert Hoo wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 11:13 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 21:15:35 +0800
> > > Robert Hoo wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 09:37 +0200, Igor
On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 20:28:31 +0800
Robert Hoo wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 11:13 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 21:15:35 +0800
> > Robert Hoo wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 09:37 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Fine, get your point now.
> > > > >
On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 11:13 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 21:15:35 +0800
> Robert Hoo wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 09:37 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >
> > > > Fine, get your point now.
> > > > In ASL it will look like this:
> > > > Local1 = Package
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 21:15:35 +0800
Robert Hoo wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 09:37 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>
> > > Fine, get your point now.
> > > In ASL it will look like this:
> > > Local1 = Package (0x3) {STTS, SLSA, MAXT}
> > > Return (Local1)
>
On Fri, 2022-09-16 at 09:37 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Fine, get your point now.
> > In ASL it will look like this:
> > Local1 = Package (0x3) {STTS, SLSA, MAXT}
> > Return (Local1)
>
>
> >
> > But as for
> > CreateDWordField (Lo
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:27:08 +0800
Robert Hoo wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-09-09 at 15:39 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> ...
> > looks more or less fine except of excessive use of named variables
> > which creates global scope variables.
> >
> > I'd suggest to store temporary buffers/packages in LocalX
On Fri, 2022-09-09 at 15:39 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
...
> looks more or less fine except of excessive use of named variables
> which creates global scope variables.
>
> I'd suggest to store temporary buffers/packages in LocalX variales,
> you should be able to do that for everything modulo
> a
On Fri, 09 Sep 2022 22:02:34 +0800
Robert Hoo wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-09-09 at 15:39 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:27:20 +0800
> > Robert Hoo wrote:
> >
> > > Recent ACPI spec [1] has defined NVDIMM Label Methods _LS{I,R,W},
> > > which
> > > deprecates corresponding _D
On Fri, 2022-09-09 at 15:39 +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:27:20 +0800
> Robert Hoo wrote:
>
> > Recent ACPI spec [1] has defined NVDIMM Label Methods _LS{I,R,W},
> > which
> > deprecates corresponding _DSM Functions defined by PMEM _DSM
> > Interface spec
> > [2].
> >
> >
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 11:27:20 +0800
Robert Hoo wrote:
> Recent ACPI spec [1] has defined NVDIMM Label Methods _LS{I,R,W}, which
> deprecates corresponding _DSM Functions defined by PMEM _DSM Interface spec
> [2].
>
> Since the semantics of the new Label Methods are same as old _DSM
> methods, the
Recent ACPI spec [1] has defined NVDIMM Label Methods _LS{I,R,W}, which
deprecates corresponding _DSM Functions defined by PMEM _DSM Interface spec
[2].
Since the semantics of the new Label Methods are same as old _DSM
methods, the implementations here simply wrapper old ones.
ASL form diff can b
11 matches
Mail list logo
