On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 04:12:00PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:41:08 -0400
> Peter Xu wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 03:06:46PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > diff --git a/hw/intc/ioapic.c b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> > > > index 15747fe2c2..81a
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 17:41:08 -0400
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 03:06:46PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > diff --git a/hw/intc/ioapic.c b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> > > index 15747fe2c2..81a17cc2b8 100644
> > > --- a/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> > > +++ b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> > > @@ -
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 03:06:46PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
[...]
> > diff --git a/hw/intc/ioapic.c b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> > index 15747fe2c2..81a17cc2b8 100644
> > --- a/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> > +++ b/hw/intc/ioapic.c
> > @@ -236,8 +236,29 @@ void ioapic_eoi_broadcast(int vector)
> > for
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:50:41 -0400
Peter Xu wrote:
> This is majorly only for X86 because that's the only one that supports
> split irqchip for now.
>
> When the irqchip is split, we face a dilemma that KVM irqfd will be
> enabled, however the slow irqchip is still running in the userspace.
> It
This is majorly only for X86 because that's the only one that supports
split irqchip for now.
When the irqchip is split, we face a dilemma that KVM irqfd will be
enabled, however the slow irqchip is still running in the userspace.
It means that the resamplefd in the kernel irqfds won't take any
ef
