Nick,
Since I started collecting fixes for 8.2 while you were away, I will
finish this cycle with a last PR next week and let you take over 9.0.
On 11/14/23 20:56, Glenn Miles wrote:
The PNV I2C engines for power9 and power10 were being assigned a base
XSCOM address that was off by one I2C en
On 11/14/23 20:56, Glenn Miles wrote:
The PNV I2C engines for power9 and power10 were being assigned a base
XSCOM address that was off by one I2C engine's address range such
that engine 0 had engine 1's address and so on. The xscom address
assignment was being based on the device tree engine num
The PNV I2C engines for power9 and power10 were being assigned a base
XSCOM address that was off by one I2C engine's address range such
that engine 0 had engine 1's address and so on. The xscom address
assignment was being based on the device tree engine numbering, which
starts at 1. Rather than
