> > No they can't. For a "regular extension" you populate the DT with the
> > extension. For these extensions it has to put negated properties in the
> > DT, otherwise it is incorrectly describing the hardware it is emulating.
> > That is handling them differently in my book! If QEMU generates an
>
On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 6:00 AM Conor Dooley wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 08:11:45PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:34:32PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 03:26:18PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:33:47PM +00
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 08:11:45PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:34:32PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 03:26:18PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:33:47PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:21:5
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 04:34:32PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 03:26:18PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:33:47PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:21:51PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > > > The RVA22U64 and RVA
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 03:26:18PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:33:47PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:21:51PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > > The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
> > > until now, we w
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:13:51AM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
...
> > I want to raise my frustration with the crock we've been given here by
> > RVI. Any "named feature" that just creates a name for something that
> > already is assumed is completely useless, and DT property that is used
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 01:33:47PM +, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:21:51PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
> > until now, we were implying that they were available.
> >
> > We can't do this anymo
On 2/15/24 10:33, Conor Dooley wrote:
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:21:51PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
until now, we were implying that they were available.
We can't do this anymore since named features also has a r
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:21:51PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
> until now, we were implying that they were available.
>
> We can't do this anymore since named features also has a riscv,isa
> entry. Let's add them to
On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 1:24 AM Daniel Henrique Barboza
wrote:
>
> The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
> until now, we were implying that they were available.
>
> We can't do this anymore since named features also has a riscv,isa
> entry. Let's add them to riscv_cpu
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:21:51PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
> until now, we were implying that they were available.
>
> We can't do this anymore since named features also has a riscv,isa
> entry. Let's add them to
The RVA22U64 and RVA22S64 profiles mandates certain extensions that,
until now, we were implying that they were available.
We can't do this anymore since named features also has a riscv,isa
entry. Let's add them to riscv_cpu_named_features[].
Instead of adding one bool for each named feature that
12 matches
Mail list logo
