On 12/7/23 16:35, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
Preparation for moving perf.c to tcg/.
This affects only profiling guest code, which has code in a non-0 based
segment, e.g., 16-bit code, which is not particularly important.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich
---
accel
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 09:53 +, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Ilya Leoshkevich writes:
>
> > Preparation for moving perf.c to tcg/.
> >
> > This affects only profiling guest code, which has code in a non-0
> > based
> > segment, e.g., 16-bit code, which is not particularly important.
>
> I have no ob
Ilya Leoshkevich writes:
> Preparation for moving perf.c to tcg/.
>
> This affects only profiling guest code, which has code in a non-0 based
> segment, e.g., 16-bit code, which is not particularly important.
I have no objection to removing the wart. Is it worth adding a note:: to
tcg.rst to say
Preparation for moving perf.c to tcg/.
This affects only profiling guest code, which has code in a non-0 based
segment, e.g., 16-bit code, which is not particularly important.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich
---
accel/tcg/perf.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 delet
