On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 10:03:53AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 06:38:27PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> This needs to be improved to be compatible with old versions.
> >
> > Any plan to let new binary work with old binary?
>
> Yes, but I was waitin
Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 06:38:27PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> This needs to be improved to be compatible with old versions.
>
> Any plan to let new binary work with old binary?
Yes, but I was waiting for 7.0 to get out. Basically I need to do:
if (old)
run the old code
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 06:38:27PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> This needs to be improved to be compatible with old versions.
Any plan to let new binary work with old binary?
Maybe boost the version field for multifd packet (along with a
multifd_version=2 parameter and only set on new machine ty
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
> > * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >> So we use multifd to transmit zero pages.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
> >> ---
> >> migration/ram.c | 22 +++---
> >> 1 file changed, 1
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote:
> * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> So we use multifd to transmit zero pages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
>> ---
>> migration/ram.c | 22 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/migratio
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> So we use multifd to transmit zero pages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
> ---
> migration/ram.c | 22 +++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
> index 57efa67f2
So we use multifd to transmit zero pages.
Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
---
migration/ram.c | 22 +++---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
index 57efa67f20..3ae094f653 100644
--- a/migration/ram.c
+++ b/migration/ram.
