Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] aspeed: fix hardcode boot address 0

2024-02-16 Thread Cédric Le Goater
On 2/15/24 08:59, Jamin Lin wrote: In the previous design of ASPEED SOCs QEMU model, it set the boot address at "0" which was the hardcode setting for ast10x0, ast2600, ast2500 and ast2400. According to the design of ast2700, it has a bootmcu(riscv-32) which is used for executing SPL and initial

[PATCH v3 2/2] aspeed: fix hardcode boot address 0

2024-02-15 Thread Jamin Lin via
In the previous design of ASPEED SOCs QEMU model, it set the boot address at "0" which was the hardcode setting for ast10x0, ast2600, ast2500 and ast2400. According to the design of ast2700, it has a bootmcu(riscv-32) which is used for executing SPL and initialize DRAM and copy u-boot image from S

[PATCH v3 2/2] aspeed: fix hardcode boot address 0

2024-02-14 Thread Jamin Lin via
In the previous design of ASPEED SOCs QEMU model, it set the boot address at "0" which was the hardcode setting for ast10x0, ast2600, ast2500 and ast2400. According to the design of ast2700, it has a bootmcu(riscv-32) which is used for executing SPL and initialize DRAM and copy u-boot image from S

[PATCH v3 2/2] aspeed: fix hardcode boot address 0

2024-02-14 Thread Jamin Lin via
In the previous design of ASPEED SOCs QEMU model, it set the boot address at "0" which was the hardcode setting for ast10x0, ast2600, ast2500 and ast2400. According to the design of ast2700, it has a bootmcu(riscv-32) which is used for executing SPL and initialize DRAM and copy u-boot image from S

[PATCH v3 2/2] aspeed: fix hardcode boot address 0

2024-02-14 Thread Jamin Lin via
In the previous design of ASPEED SOCs QEMU model, it set the boot address at "0" which was the hardcode setting for ast10x0, ast2600, ast2500 and ast2400. According to the design of ast2700, it has a bootmcu(riscv-32) which is used for executing SPL and initialize DRAM and copy u-boot image from S