On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:13:42AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:47:07 +0200
> Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> > Commit 9b3a35ec82 ("virtio: verify that legacy support is not accidentally
> > on") added a check that returns an error if legacy support is on, but the
> > device
On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 09:47:07 +0200
Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Commit 9b3a35ec82 ("virtio: verify that legacy support is not accidentally
> on") added a check that returns an error if legacy support is on, but the
> device is not legacy.
s/is not legacy/does not support legacy/ ?
>
> Unfortuna
Commit 9b3a35ec82 ("virtio: verify that legacy support is not accidentally
on") added a check that returns an error if legacy support is on, but the
device is not legacy.
Unfortunately some devices were wrongly declared legacy even if they
were not (e.g vhost-vsock).
To avoid migration issues, we
