On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:14:20PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:11:16AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:58:57AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > > Note that several things that I believe are now in the PCIe spec, but
> > > really derive more
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 03:11:16AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:58:57AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > Note that several things that I believe are now in the PCIe spec, but
> > really derive more from PC legacy considerations, don't apply at all
> > for PAPR. e.g.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 11:58:57AM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> Note that several things that I believe are now in the PCIe spec, but
> really derive more from PC legacy considerations, don't apply at all
> for PAPR. e.g. there's no meaningful distinction between integrated
> and slotted devices,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 11:56:11AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 03:30:08PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> > PAPR specifies a kind of odd, paravirtualized PCI bus, which looks to
> > the guess mostly like classic PCI, even if some of the individual
> > devices on the bus
On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 07:03:34 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:43:29AM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:31:46 +0100
> > Greg Kurz wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:30:08 +1100
> > > David Gibson wrote:
> > >
> > > > PAPR specifies a kind of
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 03:30:08PM +1100, David Gibson wrote:
> PAPR specifies a kind of odd, paravirtualized PCI bus, which looks to
> the guess mostly like classic PCI, even if some of the individual
> devices on the bus are PCI Express. One consequence of that is that
> virtio-pci devices still
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:43:29AM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:31:46 +0100
> Greg Kurz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:30:08 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > PAPR specifies a kind of odd, paravirtualized PCI bus, which looks to
> > > the guess mostly like classic
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:43:29AM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:31:46 +0100
> Greg Kurz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:30:08 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > PAPR specifies a kind of odd, paravirtualized PCI bus, which looks to
> > > the guess mostly like classic
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 11:31:46 +0100
Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:30:08 +1100
> David Gibson wrote:
>
> > PAPR specifies a kind of odd, paravirtualized PCI bus, which looks to
> > the guess mostly like classic PCI, even if some of the individual
> > devices on the bus are PCI Express.
On Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:30:08 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> PAPR specifies a kind of odd, paravirtualized PCI bus, which looks to
> the guess mostly like classic PCI, even if some of the individual
> devices on the bus are PCI Express. One consequence of that is that
> virtio-pci devices still defa
PAPR specifies a kind of odd, paravirtualized PCI bus, which looks to
the guess mostly like classic PCI, even if some of the individual
devices on the bus are PCI Express. One consequence of that is that
virtio-pci devices still default to being in transitional mode, though
legacy mode is now disa
11 matches
Mail list logo
