Hi,
On 2023-04-05 13:53, Alistair Francis wrote:
>
>On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:12 PM Hang Xu wrote:
>>
>> Because the starting address of ram is not necessarily 0,
>> the remaining free space in ram is
>> ram_size - (start - ram_base) instead of ram_size-start.
>
>I think this could be clea
On 4/5/23 02:53, Alistair Francis wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:12 PM Hang Xu wrote:
Because the starting address of ram is not necessarily 0,
the remaining free space in ram is
ram_size - (start - ram_base) instead of ram_size-start.
I think this could be clearer. It's not clear here
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:12 PM Hang Xu wrote:
>
> Because the starting address of ram is not necessarily 0,
> the remaining free space in ram is
> ram_size - (start - ram_base) instead of ram_size-start.
I think this could be clearer. It's not clear here that you mean the
free space after the k
On 3/13/23 12:49, Anup Patel wrote:
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Hang Xu wrote:
Because the starting address of ram is not necessarily 0,
the remaining free space in ram is
ram_size - (start - ram_base) instead of ram_size-start.
Signed-off-by: Hang Xu
What happens in-case a platform
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 7:49 AM Hang Xu wrote:
>
> Because the starting address of ram is not necessarily 0,
> the remaining free space in ram is
> ram_size - (start - ram_base) instead of ram_size-start.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hang Xu
What happens in-case a platform has multiple RAM banks ?
Regard
Because the starting address of ram is not necessarily 0,
the remaining free space in ram is
ram_size - (start - ram_base) instead of ram_size-start.
Signed-off-by: Hang Xu
---
hw/riscv/boot.c| 19 +--
hw/riscv/microchip_pfsoc.c | 5 -
hw/riscv/opentitan.c
On 3/12/23 23:18, Hang Xu wrote:
Because the starting address of ram is not necessarily 0,
the remaining free space in ram is
ram_size - (start - ram_base) instead of ram_size-start.
Signed-off-by: Hang Xu
---
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza
hw/riscv/boot.c| 19 ++
