On 9/28/20 11:51 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 08:28:18PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
For whatever reason, when these are stored as functions instead of
strings, it confuses sphinx-autodoc into believing them to be
docstrings, and it chokes on the syntax.
Interesting...
Keeping
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 08:28:18PM -0400, John Snow wrote:
> For whatever reason, when these are stored as functions instead of
> strings, it confuses sphinx-autodoc into believing them to be
> docstrings, and it chokes on the syntax.
>
Interesting...
> Keeping them as dumb strings instead avoids
On 9/25/20 4:59 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
For whatever reason, when these are stored as functions instead of
strings, it confuses sphinx-autodoc into believing them to be
docstrings, and it chokes on the syntax.
Keeping them as dumb strings instead avoids the problem.
Si
John Snow writes:
> For whatever reason, when these are stored as functions instead of
> strings, it confuses sphinx-autodoc into believing them to be
> docstrings, and it chokes on the syntax.
>
> Keeping them as dumb strings instead avoids the problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Snow
Quoting my
For whatever reason, when these are stored as functions instead of
strings, it confuses sphinx-autodoc into believing them to be
docstrings, and it chokes on the syntax.
Keeping them as dumb strings instead avoids the problem.
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
scripts/qapi/doc.py | 40 ++
