On 1/29/21 9:15 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> If someone decides to use TCG_TARGET_HAS_div2_i64 instead of
> TCG_TARGET_HAS_div_i64 with TCI, that lines (in addition to the implementation
> of the opcodes) would be needed again.
How can you know if those lines are even correct, when there is no
infrast
Am 30.01.21 um 07:47 schrieb Richard Henderson:
On 1/29/21 1:16 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 20:13, Richard Henderson
wrote:
The opcodes always exist, regardless of whether or not they
are enabled. Remove the unnecessary ifdefs.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
tcg
On 1/29/21 1:16 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 20:13, Richard Henderson
> wrote:
>>
>> The opcodes always exist, regardless of whether or not they
>> are enabled. Remove the unnecessary ifdefs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
>> ---
>> tcg/tci/tcg-target.c.inc | 82 ---
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 20:13, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> The opcodes always exist, regardless of whether or not they
> are enabled. Remove the unnecessary ifdefs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
> ---
> tcg/tci/tcg-target.c.inc | 82
> 1 file chan
The opcodes always exist, regardless of whether or not they
are enabled. Remove the unnecessary ifdefs.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
tcg/tci/tcg-target.c.inc | 82
1 file changed, 82 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tcg/tci/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/tci/t
