On 2/16/24 07:45, Alex Bennée wrote:
Ilya Leoshkevich writes:
Currently ts_tid contains the parent tid after fork(), which is not
correct. So far it has not affected anything, but the upcoming
follow-fork-mode child support relies on the correct value, so fix it.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevi
Ilya Leoshkevich writes:
> Currently ts_tid contains the parent tid after fork(), which is not
> correct. So far it has not affected anything, but the upcoming
> follow-fork-mode child support relies on the correct value, so fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich
> ---
> bsd-user/main.c
Currently ts_tid contains the parent tid after fork(), which is not
correct. So far it has not affected anything, but the upcoming
follow-fork-mode child support relies on the correct value, so fix it.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich
---
bsd-user/main.c | 1 +
linux-user/main.c | 1 +
2 files
