Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Improve integration of iotests in the meson test harness

2022-03-23 Thread Hanna Reitz
On 21.03.22 18:26, Thomas Huth wrote: On 21/03/2022 17.14, Hanna Reitz wrote: On 23.02.22 10:38, Thomas Huth wrote: Though "make check-block" is currently already run via the meson test runner, it still looks like an oddball in the output of "make check". It would be nicer if the iotests would

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Improve integration of iotests in the meson test harness

2022-03-21 Thread Thomas Huth
On 21/03/2022 17.14, Hanna Reitz wrote: On 23.02.22 10:38, Thomas Huth wrote: Though "make check-block" is currently already run via the meson test runner, it still looks like an oddball in the output of "make check". It would be nicer if the iotests would show up like the other tests suites. M

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Improve integration of iotests in the meson test harness

2022-03-21 Thread Hanna Reitz
On 23.02.22 10:38, Thomas Huth wrote: Though "make check-block" is currently already run via the meson test runner, it still looks like an oddball in the output of "make check". It would be nicer if the iotests would show up like the other tests suites. My original plan was to add each iotests i

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Improve integration of iotests in the meson test harness

2022-02-24 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 2/23/22 10:38, Thomas Huth wrote: This way, we can now finally get the output of failed tests on the console again (unless you're running meson test in verbose mode, where meson only puts this to the log file - for incomprehensible reasons), It's a bug (introduced by yours truly, which perha

[PATCH v3 0/4] Improve integration of iotests in the meson test harness

2022-02-23 Thread Thomas Huth
Though "make check-block" is currently already run via the meson test runner, it still looks like an oddball in the output of "make check". It would be nicer if the iotests would show up like the other tests suites. My original plan was to add each iotests individually from meson.build, but I did