On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 10:16 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
> On 12/19/22 08:13, James Bottomley wrote:
> > From: James Bottomley
> >
> > The requested feedback was to convert the tpmdev handler to being
> > json
> > based, which requires rethreading all the backends. The good news
> > is
> >
On 12/19/22 08:13, James Bottomley wrote:
From: James Bottomley
The requested feedback was to convert the tpmdev handler to being json
based, which requires rethreading all the backends. The good news is
this reduced quite a bit of code (especially as I converted it to
error_fatal handling
On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 09:15 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
> On 12/19/22 08:55, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 08:51 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/19/22 08:13, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > From: James Bottomley
> > > >
> > > > The requested feedback
On 12/19/22 08:55, James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 08:51 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 12/19/22 08:13, James Bottomley wrote:
From: James Bottomley
The requested feedback was to convert the tpmdev handler to being
json based, which requires rethreading all the backends. Th
On Mon, 2022-12-19 at 08:51 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
> On 12/19/22 08:13, James Bottomley wrote:
> > From: James Bottomley
> >
> > The requested feedback was to convert the tpmdev handler to being
> > json based, which requires rethreading all the backends. The good
> > news is this red
On 12/19/22 08:13, James Bottomley wrote:
From: James Bottomley
The requested feedback was to convert the tpmdev handler to being json
based, which requires rethreading all the backends. The good news is
this reduced quite a bit of code (especially as I converted it to
error_fatal handling
From: James Bottomley
The requested feedback was to convert the tpmdev handler to being json
based, which requires rethreading all the backends. The good news is
this reduced quite a bit of code (especially as I converted it to
error_fatal handling as well, which removes the return status
thread