Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL psw.addr reporting

2021-06-21 Thread jonathan.albrecht
On 2021-06-21 9:44 am, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 09:12 -0400, jonathan.albrecht wrote: On 2021-06-21 8:00 am, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 11:49 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > On 02.06.21 02:22, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > > qemu-s390x puts a wrong val

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL psw.addr reporting

2021-06-21 Thread Ilya Leoshkevich
On Mon, 2021-06-21 at 09:12 -0400, jonathan.albrecht wrote: > On 2021-06-21 8:00 am, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 11:49 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > > > On 02.06.21 02:22, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > > > qemu-s390x puts a wrong value into SIGILL's siginfo_t's > > > > psw.a

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL psw.addr reporting

2021-06-21 Thread jonathan.albrecht
On 2021-06-21 8:00 am, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 11:49 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: On 02.06.21 02:22, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > qemu-s390x puts a wrong value into SIGILL's siginfo_t's psw.addr: > it > should be a pointer to the instruction following the illegal > instruct

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL psw.addr reporting

2021-06-21 Thread Ilya Leoshkevich
On Thu, 2021-06-10 at 11:49 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 02.06.21 02:22, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > > qemu-s390x puts a wrong value into SIGILL's siginfo_t's psw.addr: > > it > > should be a pointer to the instruction following the illegal > > instruction, but at the moment it is a pointer t

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL psw.addr reporting

2021-06-10 Thread Christian Borntraeger
On 10.06.21 11:49, David Hildenbrand wrote: On 02.06.21 02:22, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: qemu-s390x puts a wrong value into SIGILL's siginfo_t's psw.addr: it should be a pointer to the instruction following the illegal instruction, but at the moment it is a pointer to the illegal instruction it

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL psw.addr reporting

2021-06-10 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 02.06.21 02:22, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: qemu-s390x puts a wrong value into SIGILL's siginfo_t's psw.addr: it should be a pointer to the instruction following the illegal instruction, but at the moment it is a pointer to the illegal instruction itself. This breaks OpenJDK, which relies on this

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL psw.addr reporting

2021-06-01 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20210602002210.3144559-1-...@linux.ibm.com/ Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Type: series Message-id: 20210602002210.3144559-1-...@linux.ibm.com Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] target/s390x: Fix

[PATCH v3 0/2] target/s390x: Fix SIGILL psw.addr reporting

2021-06-01 Thread Ilya Leoshkevich
qemu-s390x puts a wrong value into SIGILL's siginfo_t's psw.addr: it should be a pointer to the instruction following the illegal instruction, but at the moment it is a pointer to the illegal instruction itself. This breaks OpenJDK, which relies on this value. Patch 1 fixes the issue, patch 2 adds