24.07.2023 20:48, Helge Deller wrote:
The last attempt to fix linux-user to be able to run static armhf
binaries fixed armhf, but broke arm64, ppc64el and s390x.
Hello Delge!
I haven't looked at this version yet (was busy today).
Have you seen https://bugs.debian.org/1041859 ?
It is.. telling.
On 7/24/23 19:48, Helge Deller wrote:
The last attempt to fix linux-user to be able to run static armhf
binaries fixed armhf, but broke arm64, ppc64el and s390x.
This patch takes another approach to fix the issue.
Instead of pre-allocatig a 16/32 MiB memory region for heap, the loader
tracks the
The last attempt to fix linux-user to be able to run static armhf
binaries fixed armhf, but broke arm64, ppc64el and s390x.
This patch takes another approach to fix the issue.
Instead of pre-allocatig a 16/32 MiB memory region for heap, the loader
tracks the highest address of both executable and
