Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] pc-bios: s390x: Rename and use PSW_MASK_ZMODE constant

On 5/21/20 7:47 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 21/05/2020 07.44, Thomas Huth wrote: >> On 14/05/2020 14.37, Janosch Frank wrote: >>> ZMODE has a lot of ambiguity with the ESAME architecture mode, but is >>> actually 64 bit addressing. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank >>> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel

Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] pc-bios: s390x: Rename and use PSW_MASK_ZMODE constant

On 21/05/2020 07.44, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 14/05/2020 14.37, Janosch Frank wrote: >> ZMODE has a lot of ambiguity with the ESAME architecture mode, but is >> actually 64 bit addressing. >> >> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank >> Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel >> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand >> --- >>

Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] pc-bios: s390x: Rename and use PSW_MASK_ZMODE constant

On 14/05/2020 14.37, Janosch Frank wrote: > ZMODE has a lot of ambiguity with the ESAME architecture mode, but is > actually 64 bit addressing. > > Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank > Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand > --- > pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c | 3 +-- > pc-bios/

[PATCH v2 4/9] pc-bios: s390x: Rename and use PSW_MASK_ZMODE constant

ZMODE has a lot of ambiguity with the ESAME architecture mode, but is actually 64 bit addressing. Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank Reviewed-by: Pierre Morel Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand --- pc-bios/s390-ccw/dasd-ipl.c | 3 +-- pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-arch.h | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+