On 8/8/24 23:47, Zhao Liu wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 11:25:45PM -0400, Ewan Hai wrote:
[snip]
Thank you for your suggestion; the changes will indeed make it clearer.
I have a question: since you’ve already added your reviewed-by tag to
the first three patches, if I want to modify these des
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 11:25:45PM -0400, Ewan Hai wrote:
[snip]
> Thank you for your suggestion; the changes will indeed make it clearer.
> I have a question: since you’ve already added your reviewed-by tag to
> the first three patches, if I want to modify these descriptions, should
> I submit a
On 8/8/24 23:22, Zhao Liu wrote:
Hi EwanHai,
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 07:25:11AM -0400, EwanHai wrote:
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:25:11 -0400
From: EwanHai
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] target/i386: Update CMPLegacy handling for Zhaoxin
CPUs
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
Zhaoxin CPUs handle
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 09:44:18PM -0400, Ewan Hai wrote:
> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 21:44:18 -0400
> From: Ewan Hai
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] target/i386: Update CMPLegacy handling for
> Zhaoxin CPUs
>
>
> Hi Zhao Liu,
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
>
Hi Zhao Liu,
Thank you for your feedback.
On 8/8/24 06:30, Zhao Liu wrote:
Hi EwanHai,
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 07:25:11AM -0400, EwanHai wrote:
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:25:11 -0400
From: EwanHai
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] target/i386: Update CMPLegacy handling for Zhaoxin
CPUs
X-Mailer
Hi EwanHai,
On Thu, Jul 04, 2024 at 07:25:11AM -0400, EwanHai wrote:
> Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:25:11 -0400
> From: EwanHai
> Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] target/i386: Update CMPLegacy handling for Zhaoxin
> CPUs
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1
>
> Zhaoxin CPUs handle the
Zhaoxin CPUs handle the CMPLegacy bit in the same way
as Intel CPUs. This patch simplifies the existing logic by
using the IS_XXX_CPU macro and includes checks for Zhaoxin
vendor to align their behavior with Intel.
Signed-off-by: EwanHai
---
target/i386/cpu.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertio
