Re: [PATCH v2 23/33] spapr: Formalize notion of active interrupt controller

2019-09-29 Thread Cédric Le Goater
On 27/09/2019 07:50, David Gibson wrote: > spapr now has the mechanism of constructing both XICS and XIVE instances of > the SpaprInterruptController interface. However, only one of the interrupt > controllers will actually be active at any given time, depending on feature > negotiation with the g

Re: [PATCH v2 23/33] spapr: Formalize notion of active interrupt controller

2019-09-27 Thread Greg Kurz
On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:50:18 +1000 David Gibson wrote: > spapr now has the mechanism of constructing both XICS and XIVE instances of > the SpaprInterruptController interface. However, only one of the interrupt > controllers will actually be active at any given time, depending on feature > negoti

[PATCH v2 23/33] spapr: Formalize notion of active interrupt controller

2019-09-26 Thread David Gibson
spapr now has the mechanism of constructing both XICS and XIVE instances of the SpaprInterruptController interface. However, only one of the interrupt controllers will actually be active at any given time, depending on feature negotiation with the guest. This is handled in the current code via sp