On Thu, 21 May 2020 15:13:45 +1000
David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 01:36:16AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 May 2020 16:44:18 -0500
> > Reza Arbab wrote:
> >
> > > NUMA nodes corresponding to GPU memory currently have the same
> > > affinity/distance as normal memory node
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 01:36:16AM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2020 16:44:18 -0500
> Reza Arbab wrote:
>
> > NUMA nodes corresponding to GPU memory currently have the same
> > affinity/distance as normal memory nodes. Add a third NUMA associativity
> > reference point enabling us to
On Mon, 18 May 2020 16:44:18 -0500
Reza Arbab wrote:
> NUMA nodes corresponding to GPU memory currently have the same
> affinity/distance as normal memory nodes. Add a third NUMA associativity
> reference point enabling us to give GPU nodes more distance.
>
> This is guest visible information, w
NUMA nodes corresponding to GPU memory currently have the same
affinity/distance as normal memory nodes. Add a third NUMA associativity
reference point enabling us to give GPU nodes more distance.
This is guest visible information, which shouldn't change under a
running guest across migration betw