Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests/block-status-cache: New test

2022-01-28 Thread Eric Blake
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 02:50:51PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 06:00:00PM +0100, Hanna Reitz wrote: > > Add a new test to verify that want_zero=false block-status calls do not > > pollute the block-status cache for want_zero=true calls. > > > > We check want_zero=true calls

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests/block-status-cache: New test

2022-01-28 Thread Eric Blake
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 06:00:00PM +0100, Hanna Reitz wrote: > Add a new test to verify that want_zero=false block-status calls do not > pollute the block-status cache for want_zero=true calls. > > We check want_zero=true calls and their results using `qemu-img map` > (over NBD), and want_zero=fal

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests/block-status-cache: New test

2022-01-18 Thread Nir Soffer
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:12 PM Hanna Reitz wrote: > > Add a new test to verify that want_zero=false block-status calls do not > pollute the block-status cache for want_zero=true calls. > > We check want_zero=true calls and their results using `qemu-img map` > (over NBD), and want_zero=false calls

[PATCH v2 2/2] iotests/block-status-cache: New test

2022-01-18 Thread Hanna Reitz
Add a new test to verify that want_zero=false block-status calls do not pollute the block-status cache for want_zero=true calls. We check want_zero=true calls and their results using `qemu-img map` (over NBD), and want_zero=false calls also using `qemu-img map` over NBD, but using the qemu:allocat