On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 04:48:08 -0500
Janosch Frank wrote:
> IO instruction data is routed through SIDAD for protected guests, so
> adresses do not need to be checked, as this is kernel memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
> ---
> target/s390x/ioinst.c | 26 +++---
> 1 fil
On 29/11/2019 10.48, Janosch Frank wrote:
> IO instruction data is routed through SIDAD for protected guests, so
> adresses do not need to be checked, as this is kernel memory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
> ---
> target/s390x/ioinst.c | 26 +++---
> 1 file changed, 19 in
On 29.11.19 10:48, Janosch Frank wrote:
> IO instruction data is routed through SIDAD for protected guests, so
> adresses do not need to be checked, as this is kernel memory.
"do not need" - is it actually evil to check? I would have assumed the
kernel checks and these checks are just superfluous
IO instruction data is routed through SIDAD for protected guests, so
adresses do not need to be checked, as this is kernel memory.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank
---
target/s390x/ioinst.c | 26 +++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/i
