On 06/10/20 19:33, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/6/20 11:43 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>>> Looks good, but...
>>>
>>> Is there any way to coax out a more reviewable version of this
>>> via git mv?
>>>
>>
>> I tried git mv, but a diff between the old patch and the new patch looks the
>> same (othe
On 10/6/20 1:33 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/6/20 11:43 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
Looks good, but...
Is there any way to coax out a more reviewable version of this
via git mv?
I tried git mv, but a diff between the old patch and the new patch looks the
same (other than the fact that I
On 10/6/20 11:43 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> Looks good, but...
>>
>> Is there any way to coax out a more reviewable version of this
>> via git mv?
>>
>
> I tried git mv, but a diff between the old patch and the new patch looks the
> same (other than the fact that I squashed the MAINTAINERS hit i
On 10/6/20 11:32 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:06:23 -0400
Matthew Rosato wrote:
Seems a more appropriate location for them.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato
---
hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 4 +-
hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 372 --
On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:06:23 -0400
Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Seems a more appropriate location for them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 4 +-
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 372
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-pci-i
Seems a more appropriate location for them.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato
---
hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.c | 4 +-
hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h | 372 ---
hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 4 +-
hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h | 312 -
