Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] util/oslib-win32: Use _aligned_malloc for qemu_try_memalign

2020-09-17 Thread Richard Henderson
On 9/17/20 11:43 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 05:46:33PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: >> We do not need or want to be allocating page sized quanta. >> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson > > Would it be safe to keep patches 2-6 applied in case this one > gets dropped or

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] util/oslib-win32: Use _aligned_malloc for qemu_try_memalign

2020-09-17 Thread Eduardo Habkost
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 05:46:33PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > We do not need or want to be allocating page sized quanta. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson Would it be safe to keep patches 2-6 applied in case this one gets dropped or reverted for any reason? I consider patches 2-6 bug

Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] util/oslib-win32: Use _aligned_malloc for qemu_try_memalign

2020-09-15 Thread Stefan Weil
Am 16.09.20 um 02:46 schrieb Richard Henderson: > We do not need or want to be allocating page sized quanta. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson > --- > Cc: Stefan Weil > --- > util/oslib-win32.c | 10 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/util/oslib-win

[PATCH v2 1/6] util/oslib-win32: Use _aligned_malloc for qemu_try_memalign

2020-09-15 Thread Richard Henderson
We do not need or want to be allocating page sized quanta. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson --- Cc: Stefan Weil --- util/oslib-win32.c | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/util/oslib-win32.c b/util/oslib-win32.c index c654dafd93..8d838bf342 100644 --- a