On 2019/12/10 0:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 03:31:54PM +0800, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
>>> From: Pan Nengyuan
>>>
>>> Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq
>>
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 11:43:20AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 03:31:54PM +0800, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
> > From: Pan Nengyuan
> >
> > Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq
> > pointer.
>
> You want to also mention something
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 03:31:54PM +0800, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Pan Nengyuan
>
> Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq pointer.
You want to also mention something about clearing
.used_elems to avoid chances of double free.
> Signed-off-by: Michael
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 03:33:07AM -0500, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>
> > From: Pan Nengyuan
> >
> > Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq
> > pointer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> > Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan
> > ---
> > Changes v2 to v1:
> > - add a
On 2019/12/6 16:56, Amit Shah wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 10:17 +0800, Pan Nengyuan wrote:
>> On 2019/12/6 0:45, Amit Shah wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 15:31 +0800, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
From: Pan Nengyuan
>>>
>>> Shouldn't this be From: mst?
>>>
>>> I didn't find a ref to th
On Fri, 2019-12-06 at 10:17 +0800, Pan Nengyuan wrote:
> On 2019/12/6 0:45, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 15:31 +0800, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
> > > From: Pan Nengyuan
> >
> > Shouldn't this be From: mst?
> >
> > I didn't find a ref to the original patch to confirm if you had
On 2019/12/6 0:45, Amit Shah wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 15:31 +0800, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
>> From: Pan Nengyuan
>
> Shouldn't this be From: mst?
>
> I didn't find a ref to the original patch to confirm if you had to
> adapt it in any way, though.
>
Here is the original
patch: ht
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 15:31 +0800, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Pan Nengyuan
Shouldn't this be From: mst?
I didn't find a ref to the original patch to confirm if you had to
adapt it in any way, though.
> Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq
> pointer.
>
>
> On 2019/12/4 16:33, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >
> >> From: Pan Nengyuan
> >>
> >> Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq
> >> pointer.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> >> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan
> >> ---
> >> Changes v2 to v1:
> >> - add a new
On 2019/12/4 22:40, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/4/19 1:31 AM, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
>> From: Pan Nengyuan
>>
>> Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq
>> pointer.
>
> through
Thanks. I'm sorry for my carelessness.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirki
On 2019/12/4 16:33, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>
>> From: Pan Nengyuan
>>
>> Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq
>> pointer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
>> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan
>> ---
>> Changes v2 to v1:
>> - add a new function virtio_delete_que
On 12/4/19 1:31 AM, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
From: Pan Nengyuan
Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq pointer.
through
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan
---
Also, don't forget to send a 0/3 cover letter (any series longer
On 04/12/2019 08:31, pannengy...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Pan Nengyuan
>
> Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan
> ---
> Changes v2 to v1:
> - add a new function virtio_delete_queue to
> From: Pan Nengyuan
>
> Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq
> pointer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan
> ---
> Changes v2 to v1:
> - add a new function virtio_delete_queue to cleanup vq through a vq pointer
> ---
> hw/vi
From: Pan Nengyuan
Devices tend to maintain vq pointers, allow deleting them trough a vq pointer.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan
---
Changes v2 to v1:
- add a new function virtio_delete_queue to cleanup vq through a vq pointer
---
hw/virtio/virtio.c | 16
15 matches
Mail list logo