On 11/18/19 8:21 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/14/19 3:26 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
- trace_pflash_data_read(offset, width << 1, ret);
+ trace_pflash_data_read(offset, width << 3, ret);
Umm, why is width changing? That's not mentioned in the commit message.
Previously it was us
On 11/14/19 3:26 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
- trace_pflash_data_read(offset, width << 1, ret);
+ trace_pflash_data_read(offset, width << 3, ret);
Umm, why is width changing? That's not mentioned in the commit message.
Previously it was used to set the format width: [1, 2, 4] ->
Hi Eric,
On 11/8/19 4:56 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 11/8/19 8:40 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Since not all trace backends support dynamic field width in
format (dtrace via stap does not), replace by a static field
width instead.
Reported-by: Eric Blake
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/
On 11/8/19 8:40 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Since not all trace backends support dynamic field width in
format (dtrace via stap does not), replace by a static field
width instead.
Reported-by: Eric Blake
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1844817
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu
Since not all trace backends support dynamic field width in
format (dtrace via stap does not), replace by a static field
width instead.
Reported-by: Eric Blake
Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1844817
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
---
hw/block/pflash_cfi01.c | 8
h
