Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] linux-user: Protect more syscalls

2020-02-25 Thread Alistair Francis
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 3:59 AM Laurent Vivier wrote: > > Le 25/02/2020 à 00:21, Alistair Francis a écrit : > > New y2038 safe 32-bit architectures (like RISC-V) don't support old > > syscalls with a 32-bit time_t. The kernel defines new *_time64 versions > > of these syscalls. Add some more #ifde

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] linux-user: Protect more syscalls

2020-02-25 Thread Laurent Vivier
Le 25/02/2020 à 00:21, Alistair Francis a écrit : > New y2038 safe 32-bit architectures (like RISC-V) don't support old > syscalls with a 32-bit time_t. The kernel defines new *_time64 versions > of these syscalls. Add some more #ifdefs to syscall.c in linux-user to > allow us to compile without th

[PATCH v2 1/2] linux-user: Protect more syscalls

2020-02-24 Thread Alistair Francis
New y2038 safe 32-bit architectures (like RISC-V) don't support old syscalls with a 32-bit time_t. The kernel defines new *_time64 versions of these syscalls. Add some more #ifdefs to syscall.c in linux-user to allow us to compile without these old syscalls. Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis Review