On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:29:31 -0700
Joelle van Dyne wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:19 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't know whether we would want multiple devices. tpm_find() usage is
> > certainly not prepared for multiple devices.
> Sorry, "multiple TPM interfaces" her
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 11:01 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/14/23 13:46, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:43 AM Stefan Berger
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/14/23 13:39, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:37 AM Stefan Berger
> >>> wrote:
>
On 7/14/23 13:46, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:43 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
On 7/14/23 13:39, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:37 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
On 7/14/23 13:29, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:19 AM Stefan Berger wrot
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:43 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/14/23 13:39, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:37 AM Stefan Berger
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/14/23 13:29, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:19 AM Stefan Berger
> >>> wrote:
> >
On 7/14/23 13:39, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:37 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
On 7/14/23 13:29, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:19 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
I don't know whether we would want multiple devices. tpm_find() usage is
certainly not prepa
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 10:37 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/14/23 13:29, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:19 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I don't know whether we would want multiple devices. tpm_find() usage is
> >> certainly not prepared for multip
On 7/14/23 13:29, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:19 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
I don't know whether we would want multiple devices. tpm_find() usage is
certainly not prepared for multiple devices.
Sorry, "multiple TPM interfaces" here does not mean "at the same
time". Wi
On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 9:19 AM Stefan Berger wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I don't know whether we would want multiple devices. tpm_find() usage is
> certainly not prepared for multiple devices.
Sorry, "multiple TPM interfaces" here does not mean "at the same
time". Will clarify the description.
>
>
> Good
On 7/14/23 03:09, Joelle van Dyne wrote:
This reduces redundent code in different machine types with ACPI table
generation. Additionally, this will allow us to support multiple TPM
interfaces. Finally, this matches up with the TPM TIS ISA
I don't know whether we would want multiple devices.
This reduces redundent code in different machine types with ACPI table
generation. Additionally, this will allow us to support multiple TPM
interfaces. Finally, this matches up with the TPM TIS ISA
implementation.
Ideally, we would be able to call `qbus_build_aml` and avoid any TPM
specific code i
10 matches
Mail list logo