On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 04:42:11PM +0200, Hanna Czenczek wrote:
> On 12.05.23 04:10, Eric Blake wrote:
> > While we were matching 32-bit strtol in qemu_strtoi, our use of a
> > 64-bit parse was leaking through for some inaccurate answers in
> > qemu_strtoui in comparison to a 32-bit strtoul. Fix t
On 12.05.23 04:10, Eric Blake wrote:
While we were matching 32-bit strtol in qemu_strtoi, our use of a
64-bit parse was leaking through for some inaccurate answers in
qemu_strtoui in comparison to a 32-bit strtoul. Fix those, and update
the testsuite now that our bounds checks are correct.
Our
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 09:10:19PM -0500, Eric Blake wrote:
>
> While we were matching 32-bit strtol in qemu_strtoi, our use of a
> 64-bit parse was leaking through for some inaccurate answers in
> qemu_strtoui in comparison to a 32-bit strtoul. Fix those, and update
> the testsuite now that our
While we were matching 32-bit strtol in qemu_strtoi, our use of a
64-bit parse was leaking through for some inaccurate answers in
qemu_strtoui in comparison to a 32-bit strtoul. Fix those, and update
the testsuite now that our bounds checks are correct.
Our int wrappers would be a lot easier to w
