Re: [PATCH v2 02/28] cputlb: Use trace_mem_get_info instead of trace_mem_build_info

Richard Henderson writes: > In the cpu_ldst templates, we already require a MemOp, and it > is cleaner and clearer to pass that instead of 3 separate > arguments describing the memory operation. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée > --- > include/exec/cpu_ldst_tem

Re: [PATCH v2 02/28] cputlb: Use trace_mem_get_info instead of trace_mem_build_info

On 12/16/19 11:11 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: In the cpu_ldst templates, we already require a MemOp, and it is cleaner and clearer to pass that instead of 3 separate arguments describing the memory operation. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson --- include/exec/cpu_ldst_template.h | 22

[PATCH v2 02/28] cputlb: Use trace_mem_get_info instead of trace_mem_build_info

In the cpu_ldst templates, we already require a MemOp, and it is cleaner and clearer to pass that instead of 3 separate arguments describing the memory operation. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson --- include/exec/cpu_ldst_template.h | 22 +++--- include/exec/cpu_ldst_use