On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 02:43:35PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2025 17:33:46 +
> Anisa Su wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:37:35AM -0700, Fan Ni wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 12:00:57AM +, anisa.su...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > From: Anisa Su
> > > >
>
On Tue, 20 May 2025 17:33:46 +
Anisa Su wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:37:35AM -0700, Fan Ni wrote:
> > On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 12:00:57AM +, anisa.su...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Anisa Su
> > >
> > > In preparation for the next patch, move opcodes enum to new cxl_opcodes.h
>
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:37:35AM -0700, Fan Ni wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 12:00:57AM +, anisa.su...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Anisa Su
> >
> > In preparation for the next patch, move opcodes enum to new cxl_opcodes.h
> > file
> > for visibility from mailbox-utils.c and i2c_mctp_cxl.
On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 12:00:57AM +, anisa.su...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Anisa Su
>
> In preparation for the next patch, move opcodes enum to new cxl_opcodes.h file
> for visibility from mailbox-utils.c and i2c_mctp_cxl.c, which checks that
> certain command sets are bound with the correct
From: Anisa Su
In preparation for the next patch, move opcodes enum to new cxl_opcodes.h file
for visibility from mailbox-utils.c and i2c_mctp_cxl.c, which checks that
certain command sets are bound with the correct MCTP binding.
Signed-off-by: Anisa Su
---
hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c | 68 ++
