Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] target/i386/kvm: fix two svm pmu virtualization bugs

2023-06-19 Thread Dongli Zhang
Hi Like and zhenyu, Thank you very much! That will be very helpful. In order to help the review, I will rebase the patchset on top of the most recent QEMU. Thank you very much! Dongli Zhang On 6/19/23 01:52, Like Xu wrote: > I think we've been stuck here too long. Sorry Dongli. > > +zhenyu, c

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] target/i386/kvm: fix two svm pmu virtualization bugs

2023-06-19 Thread Like Xu
I think we've been stuck here too long. Sorry Dongli. +zhenyu, could you get someone to follow up on this, or I will start working on that. On 9/1/2023 9:19 am, Dongli Zhang wrote: Ping? About [PATCH v2 2/2], the bad thing is that the customer will not be able to notice the issue, that is, t

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] target/i386/kvm: fix two svm pmu virtualization bugs

2023-01-08 Thread Dongli Zhang
Ping? About [PATCH v2 2/2], the bad thing is that the customer will not be able to notice the issue, that is, the "Broken BIOS detected" in dmesg, immediately. As a result, the customer VM many panic randomly anytime in the future (once issue is encountered) if "/proc/sys/kernel/unknown_nmi_panic

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] target/i386/kvm: fix two svm pmu virtualization bugs

2022-12-19 Thread Dongli Zhang
Can I get feedback for this patchset, especially the [PATCH v2 2/2]? About the [PATCH v2 2/2], currently the issue impacts the usage of PMUs on AMD VM, especially the below case: 1. Enable panic on nmi. 2. Use perf to monitor the performance of VM. Although without a test, I think the nmi watchdo

[PATCH v2 0/2] target/i386/kvm: fix two svm pmu virtualization bugs

2022-12-01 Thread Dongli Zhang
This patchset is to fix two svm pmu virtualization bugs, x86 only. version 1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221119122901.2469-1-dongli.zh...@oracle.com/ 1. The 1st bug is that "-cpu,-pmu" cannot disable svm pmu virtualization. To use "-cpu EPYC" or "-cpu host,-pmu" cannot disable the pmu virtual